BREAKING NEWS UPDATES: Newt Gingrich Surges Past RINO Romney To Win South Carolina Primary 40% to 27%, An About 25% Swing In Just A Few Days! “Thank you to everyone in South Carolina who decided to be with us in changing Washington,” Gingrich told his energetic supporters. “The biggest thing I take from the campaign in South Carolina is that it is very humbling and very sobering to have so many people who so deeply want their country to get back on the right track.”
“If you look at the four of us,” he said, “we are proof that you can come from a wide range of backgrounds. And in America you have a chance to make your case no matter what the elites think in New York and Washington.”
Gingrich explained that Obama is “the most effective food stamp president in history,” he said. “I would like to be the best paycheck president in American history.”
Newt Gingrich Surges, Wins South Carolina Primary! Newt Gingrich has won the South Carolina Republican primary according to Fox News projections, with RINO Mitt Romney placing second, Rick Santorum placing third and dangerous-in-foreign-policy Ron Paul taking fourth.
Gingrich explained in the South Carolina contest that he was the “genuine Conservative,” describing himself as a “Reagan Conservative.” to go up against a Saul Alinsky Socialist, President Barack Hussein Obama.
Gingrich Beats Media In South Carolina, 54 to 14 The poll was conducted by Public Policy Polling (PPP) who interviewed 1,540 likely South Carolina Republican primary voters from Jan. 18 to Jan. 20. It showed that 54% had a favorable opinion of Gingrich, while only 37% said they had an unfavorable opinion of him.
Only 14% said they had a favorable opinion of the media, while 77% said they had an unfavorable opinion of the media, with the only Republican candidate who had a higher favorable rating than Gingrich being Mr. Santorum.
Newt To Appear on Sunday News Shows NBC’s “Meet the Press” – 2012 GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich. CBS’ “Face the Nation” – Gingrich. CNN’s “State of the Union” – Gingrich.
RINO Romney Sends Newt A Cake To Celebrate What??? Nancy Pelosi’s Slimy Politically Motivated ‘Ethics’ ‘Witch-Hunt’ Investigations!!! On the very day that Republicans go to the polls to decide whether RINO Romney or Newt Gingrich ought to be their nominee, RINO Romney just had to try and stick it to Newt by sending him a cake according to a Fox News account, celebrating the 15th anniversary of Nancy Pelosi’s slew of dozens of false and unfounded investigations, which was really a Democratic ‘witch hunt’ to try to derail the continuation of the Reagan Revolution, that Newt was trying to undertake by reforming welfare, balancing America’s budgets, creating conditions for the creation of many millions of American jobs and doing other great things FOR America and Americans. This just goes to show who’s side Romney is and was on, and that is Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Party’s side, versus true Conservatives and the Republican Party. This IS just ANOTHER reason why I call Romney a RINO!!!
The Romney campaign sent out a press release earlier in the day marking the occasion, entitled “Happy 15th Anniversary, Mr. Speaker,” which included articles on the subject.
RINO Romney Lowers Expectations, Says ‘Newt Will Win Some Primaries’ “I expect that Newt will win some primaries and contests, and I expect I will as well.
Despicable Is Mitt Romney: Romney Sending Cake To Newt Gingrich On Ethics Anniversary “Be clear about one thing: the Ethics Charges against Newt Gringrich, for which he was fined, involved teaching conservatism in a university classroom. If this story is true, and I find it hard to believe it is, the Romney campaign is sending Newt Gingrich a cake to celebrate the day Newt was reprimanded with a fine. The fine of $300,000 was set ONLY to cover expenses of the House Ethics Committee witchhunt.
“Democrat Ben Jones, a Gingrich challenger, brought the charges in 1994, alleging Gingrich violated (501(c)(3) organizations for political gain.
“When not resolved in the 103rd Congress, Democrat David Bonoir took up the mantle in January 1995. Democrats got their claws into the new Speaker of the House, expanded the investigation and formed a Special Counsel.” – Maggie
“…the subcommittee issued a Statement of Alleged Violation with respect to the initial allegation pertaining to Renewing American Civilization and also with respect to items 1 and 4 above.
“The Subcommittee DID NOT find any violations of House Rules in regard to the issues set forth in items 2 and 3 above.
The Subcommittee, however, decided to recommend that the full Committee make available to the IRS documents produced during the Preliminary Inquiry for use in its ongoing inquiries of 501(c)(3) organization.
“In regard to item 3 above, the Subcommittee decided to issue some advice to Members concerning the proper use of outside consultants for official purposes.” – “In the matter of Representative Newt Gingrich”
Poll: Gingrich Quickly Gaining Ground On Romney
Chuck Norris Endorses Newt Gingrich For President In 2012
“I’m tired of watching our country being torn to shreds by those who think the answer is more government debt and control. I’m tired of being in bondage to a tax system that robs U.S. citizens like the King of England did before the Revolution,” Norris wrote.”I’m tired of watching our sovereignty being sold by foreign loans and loose borders. And I will not sit back and merely watch this decay and degradation of the U.S. and then hand it over to my children and grandchildren to deal with.”
“President Obama has tried and failed miserably to fix our economy, deepening us and our posterity into more than six trillion dollars in additional national debt – something he criticized former President Bush for as ‘unpatriotic’ and ‘irresponsible.’ Yet unemployment rates remain at higher levels than when Obama was elected, and the dollar is as unstable as the Middle East. ”
“Rome is burning, and we need to appoint the best firemen possible to rush in and put out her fury. What’s critical at this point is to appoint a commander-in-chief who can clearly lead America to a more solvent and secure future,” he said.
“No man or candidate is perfect. We all have skeletons in our closet. If buried bones became unforgiveable bones of contention, the world would never know or will never know another Benjamin Franklin, King David, and others like them,” he said.
Newt Gingrich Wins CNN GOP Presidential Debate “Politico has Newt Gingrich seven points behind Romney among likely voters at 30%. After tonight’s debate, Gingrich may close that gap further. Romney floundered once again on the issue of his tax returns. He took a beating on both Romneycare and abortion. His confidence seems diminished.
“Meanwhile Newt has this incredible way of segueing between attacks on Obama and attacks on Romney. Once again Newt is showing off his debating skills and his ability to sound reasonable while saying seriously crazy things all at the same time. His arrogance is galling but the crowd loves him.
“This was a bad night for Romney and another win for Newt.“ —
Vote For The Winner Of The CNN Debate In South Carolina
“Newt Did Better” In The CNN South Carolina Debate “I think Newt Gingrich did very well tonight. I think he knows it. He’s right. I’ve heard a number of people say that Rick Santorum had a really strong debate too and even that he ‘won’ the debate. Santorum was basically more on his game than I think I’ve ever heard him. He had a really good debate. I think Newt did better. But here’s the key: Gingrich is in a position to capitalize in a big way on a strong debate performance. I don’t think Santorum is. So it all comes down to a very strong performance by Newt — one I think will likely clinch a win for him on Saturday night, notwithstanding the tell-all interview coming later tonight.” — Josh Marshall
Newt Wins CNN Debate With Another Strong Showing Though the candidates sparred with Gingrich on other issues, they apparently steered clear of the Gingrich’s ex-wife.
“Let’s get onto the real issues, that’s all I’ve got to say,” said Romney.
An interview by his ex-wife, Marianne, is where she claimed that Newt e sought an “open marriage.”
“The story is false,” Gingrich said.
Gingrich then confronted CNN moderator John King, who posed the question about Marianne’s claims.
“I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that,” Gingrich declared. “To take an ex-wife and make it, two days before the primary, a significant question in a presidential campaign, is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine.”
“I am frankly astounded that CNN would take trash like that and use it to open a presidential debate,” Newt added.
The candidates in near unison condemned a proposed anti-online piracy law that its critics say is way too aggressive.
Gingrich said the law pre-emptively censors the Internet on behalf of corporations, explaining that there are patents and copyrights to protect creators’ rights, in which case if someone is stealing, then the owners should sue under those existing laws.
After an attack by Santorum against Gingrich for the more Conservative label, Newt schooled Rick about history.
“Long before Rick came to Congress I was busy being a rebel, creating a conservative opportunity society, developing a plan to win a majority in the Congress,” Gingrich said, saying that history is fact even if it’s “inconvenient for Rick’s campaign.”
Newt Gingrich Wins CNN South Carolina Debate In First Five Minutes
“Newt Rampages, Romney Folds: Gingrich Won The Debate In The First Minute And Left Romney Looking Weak” “Newt Gingrich won the debate in the first minute by casting himself as the victim not of a failed marriage but of a corrupt liberal media that is in bed with Barack Obama…Romney knew he’d be asked about releasing his tax returns. But unlike Gingrich, who was loaded for bear, Romney was came off as defensive, disingenuous, and dodgy.” —
Newt Gingrich Wins CNN South Carolina Debate By Slamming Obama-Friendly MSM The former speaker, upset by the topic of his ex-wife and her claims, turned the subject back onto King and the media for talking about fake stories in the first place.
“I think the destructive, vicious, negative nature of much of the news media makes it harder to govern this country, harder to attract decent people to run for office, and I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that,” Gingrich explained.
The article goes on to say that “many experts believe that he handled the explosive moment very well and might actually win the upcoming election based on his answer that played well with the crowd in the room and with voters.”
CNN’s King Get’s Spanked & Mitt Gets Challenged: CNN South Carolina Debate Recap “Newt won this debate in the first three minutes, but his Achilles heel has always been his intellectual arrogance and perhaps that arrogance was a bit too pronounced at points. Some voters may be turned off by that. Santorum was a close second. He fought like a man with nothing left to lose. Even if he goes home after Saturday the man deserves major kudos for going from someone who most Americans had never heard of to one of the final four candidates in a particularly bloody GOP primary battle. He has earned my respect in this process.
“Mitt Romney lost this debate if for no other reason than the expectations have been so very high for him for so very long. It was a lackluster, stilted performance that will be sure to weaken him as the primaries get underway on Saturday.” — Kira Davis
Newt Gingrich Emerges As Master Of The Turnaround Line At CNN Debate In South Carolina
Newt Gingrich Gets Two Standing Ovations! “CNN’s John King wasted no time in going after Newt Gingrich over his ex-wife’s interview with ABC. When King asked him if he had any comment about it, Newt said, “No.” It won him an instant standing ovation.
“Gingrich received a second standing ovation when he said he was “tired of the elite media covering for Barack Obama.”
“If Newt wins the nomination then this is the turning point.” — Aaron Goldstein
Gingrich, Santorum Shine, Romney Doesn’t At CNN Debate Before South Carolina Primary “If Santorum and Gingrich had some of the strongest moments, Romney had some of the weakest.
“As he did at Monday night’s debate, Romney once again stumbled badly when asked if he would release his tax returns.
“Romney was at his most disjointed in answering that, saying he would release his 2010 tax return in April but sounding dodgy on when or if he would release earlier returns.
“When King asked if he would follow the example of his father, George Romney, who as a presidential candidate in the 1960s released 12 years’ worth of returns, Romney said “Maybe.” That was about as non-committal as you can get. He actually drew boos from the audience which caused him to pause in his reply for a few seconds.” – NPR People: Frank James
Poll: Rick Santorum Likely To Finish Behind Ron Paul In South Carolina
Newt Gingrich Surges Ahead Of RINO Romney In New South Carolina Poll Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has surged ahead of Mitt Romney in the final poll taken by Rasmussen Reports of the South Carolina Republican Primary race.
Likely GOP Primary Voters in the state support Newt with 33% to Romney’s 31%, versus two days ago Romney led the Conservative GOP candidate by 14 percentage points.
Ron Paul has 15% of the vote, followed by Rick Santorum at 11%, which is down five points since Monday.
Newt’s Favorabililty Rating Jumps To Plus 30, 64% to 34% Gingrich’s net favorability rating has improved from +14 percent (55 to 41 percent) to +30 percent (64 to 34 percent). This while all of the other candidates’ net favorability ratings have dropped, with RINO Romney going from +40 (68 to 28 percent) to +34 (66 to 32 percent), Santorum from +33 (64 to 31 percent) to +22 (58 to 36 percent), and Paul from minus-6 (45 to 51 percent) to minus-16 (40 to 56 percent).
Propelled By Tea Party Support, Gingrich Takes Lead In South Carolina “I think that increasingly the polling data indicates that I’m the only conservative who has the chance to beat Romney,” Gingrich explains. “If we can communicate that and get people to come in, I think the margin gets bigger and bigger. If you add up the combined total conservative vote in these polls, we would be beating Romney by a pretty impressive margin.”
“Santorum’s got to do what he wants to do,” he said. “Look, you all said I was dead in June and July. I didn’t get out of the race. No reason he should do it if he doesn’t want. He just came in ahead in Iowa today, ending Romney’s brief period as the only guy who carried both [Iowa and New Hampshire].”
“The number one thing we now know is that when this becomes a two-person race, that Romney has a huge problem because he’s too liberal for most Republican voters. Now that’s just an objective fact. Governor Perry helped today. I think the fact is that with each passing week, it’s become clearer and clearer. We’re going to do everything we can in the next 72 hours to win here.”
“Look, I think this is a decision you are going to have to make,” Gingrich replied. “I’ve been very open about the mistakes I have made. I have been very open about needing to go to God for forgiveness and to seek reconciliation. Callista and I have a wonderful relationship. We are very close to our two daughters and their husbands. We are very close to our two grandchildren, Maggie and Robert. I’m 68 years old. I am a grandfather. We entered this race—we had to think this through for a year. We knew we’d get beaten up. We knew we’d get smeared. We knew we’d get nasty attack ads. And we decided the country was worth the pain.”
That last statement, according to the article, got an extended applause from the audience.
So, good call media! Way to go to covertly hype this, even Gingrich opponents, for being so brilliant they sure are dumb.” — Sarah Palin
Rick Perry Endorses Newt Gingrich For President, Newt Responds Gingrich explained that he was “humbled and honored” to have Perry’s support.
“I ask the supporters of Governor Perry to look at my record of balancing the budget, cutting spending, reforming welfare, and enacting pro-growth policies to create millions of new jobs,” Gingrich said.
“President Obama’s decision to reject the XL pipeline weakens America’s national security and kills thousands of well paying American jobs.
Along with yesterday’s decision to cancel the long planned U.S.-Israeli war game, the Obama administration is signaling extraordinary national security weakness at a time when the Iranian regime is threatening to shut down the Straits of Hormuz.
President Obama has made it clear once again that he is committed to Saul Alinksy radicalism at the expense of working Americans. This radicalism is especially evident in today’s decision given that just 24 hours ago President Obama’s own Panel on Jobs and Competitiveness published a report calling for the creation of new jobs through the construction of pipelines like Keystone XL Pipeline and the expansion of oil and gas production.
At a time when American families and businesses are facing record high gas prices and a weak economy, the President has made clear that is not going to do anything to help them. I will grant the permit to build the Keystone XL Pipeline on my first day in the Oval Office, as well as unleash domestic energy production to strengthen the economy and create jobs.”
“Newt is one of the few people in all of the United States…who truly understands the dangers that are surrounding our nation and Western Civilization. He is one of the few people who truly knows…the threat that is coming to our doorstep. “
“I’m couldn’t be happier in having Dr. Youssef on board,” said Newt Gingrich. “Our Faith Leaders Coalition will benefit tremendously from his leadership as a Pastor, a communicator, and an immigrant to the U.S.”Medal Of Honor Recipient Major General James E. Livingston, USMC (Ret) Endorses Newt Gingrich For President A South Carolina Lowcountry resident, decorated war hero, and prominent member of America’s veterans community, General Livingston today withdrew his support of Texas Governor Rick Perry’s candidacy and announced he intends to promptly begin campaigning for Speaker Newt Gingrich. “I appreciate Governor Perry’s efforts, and adore him and his wife Anita. But I have come to the conclusion that Republicans need to get behind a conservative candidate who is developing the momentum needed to win in South Carolina and beyond,” General Livingston explained.
Commenting on his decision to support Newt Gingrich, General Livingston stated: “The 2012 election represents one of the most important events in the history of this country. I believe Newt Gingrich is the firewall Republicans can rely on to block a liberal agenda that will destroy America’s position of strength in the world. It is imperative for Republicans in South Carolina and beyond to rally behind a conservative candidate who is capable of winning both the SCGOP and the national Republican primaries. Newt Gingrich has proven he is the strongest candidate among the conservative Republicans running for president. I look forward to helping Newt achieve a victory for all Americans who want to put our country back on the right track.”
Responding to this unexpected news, Newt Gingrich expressed his gratitude for General Livingston’s support. “I have known General Livingston for many years. He has been a friend and a trusted adviser. I am both honored to have him join our team and grateful for his support and confidence in my candidacy,” the Speaker remarked. “We look forward to working with patriots like General Livingston, and to offering Republican voters the strongest possible alternative to the Obama agenda.”
Gingrich Calls For Creation Of Commission On Gold To Examine How To Get Back To Hard Money “We need to get our house in order. And we need to vaccinate ourselves against foreign contagion. The correct answer to the Euro is not to spend more American money propping up the Germans who prop up Southern Europe. The correct answer is to figure how we seal our banks off; how we make sure we protect ourselves and then say to the Europeans: you have a problem and you need to solve it.
“Part of our approach ought to be to reestablish something Ronald Reagan did in 1981 and that is to have a Commission on Gold to look at the whole concept of how do we get back to hard money.
“We need to repeal the Humphrey-Hawkins Act. We need to say to the Federal Reserve: your only job is to maintain the stability of the dollar because we want a dollar to be worth thirty years from now what it is worth now because that optimizes saving and investment because people know what they are going to back.
“The very purpose of founding the Constitution was landowners and property owners who did not want inflation. And they felt that under the Articles of Confederation they were increasingly getting inflated paper money.
“Hard money is a discipline. It means you can’t just hide from your problems; you’ve got to solve them. And you can’t inflate away your difficulties; you actually have to work them away. But I think it is very important for us to understand in finance that the entire contraption that has been built up over the last thirty or forty years has so much paper in it, so much debt, so much leverage, that we probably have a fifteen or twenty year period of working our way out of it.” – GOP Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich
Below, Gingrich’s daughters issue a memo to ABC News:
To: ABC News Leadership
From: Kathy Lubbers, Jackie Cushman
Date: January 18, 2012
The failure of a marriage is a terrible and emotional experience for everyone involved. Anyone who has had that experience understands it is a personal tragedy filled with regrets, and sometimes differing memories of events.
We will not say anything negative about our father’s ex-wife. He has said before, privately and publicly, that he regrets any pain he may have caused in the past to people he loves.
ABC News or other campaigns may want to talk about the past, just days before an important primary election. But Newt is going to talk to the people of South Carolina about the future– about job creation, lower taxes, and about who can defeat Barack Obama by providing the sharpest contrast to his damaging, extreme liberalism. We are confident this is the conversation the people of South Carolina are interested in having.
Our father is running for President because of his grandchildren – so they can inherit the America he loves. To do that, President Obama must be defeated. And as the only candidate in the race, including Obama, who has actually helped balance the national budget, create jobs, reform welfare, and cut taxes and spending, Newt felt compelled to run – to serve his country and safeguard his grandchildren’s future.
“President Obama is about to destroy tens of thousands of American jobs and sell American energy security to the Chinese,” said Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner. “The president won’t stand up to his political base even to create American jobs. This is not the end of this fight.”
“I hope that every conservative will decide to vote for me. If they do, we will win by a surprising margin,” Gingrich said.
Mitt Romney Did Not Govern As A Conservative Regarding Same-Sex “Marriages, Homosexual Adoptions: His Programs Promoted Homosexuality And Cross-Dressing To CHILDREN!!! Through the “Report Card on the Natural Family,” produced by SaveAmerica.com, the national arm of SaveCalifornia.com, it’s been uncovered that Mitt Romney did not govern as a conservative regarding same-sex “marriages,” homosexual adoptions, and his programs promoting homosexuality and cross-dressing to children.
WHAT THE REPORT CARD DISCOVERED ABOUT MITT ROMNEY
ISSUE 1: Support protecting marriage licenses and marriage rights for only one man and one woman? Romney: NO. Documentation: In Massachusetts, Romney without any constitutional authority created homosexual “marriages,” personally issued 189 same-sex “marriage” licenses, and fired town clerks that conscientiously disagreed.
ISSUE 2: Oppose marriage substitutes, such as civil unions and domestic partnerships? Romney: NO. Documentation: As governor, Romney advocated for marriage-like “same-sex domestic partnerships” and even pursued legalizing “civil unions,” which would have awarded all the rights of marriage to homosexuals.
ISSUE 3: Oppose homosexual couples adopting children? Romney: NO. Documentation: As Governor, Romney spoke in favor of “adoptive parent rights” (2003) and “children born to same-sex couples, and adopted by same-sex couples” (2005), stated homosexuals have “a legitimate interest” to adopt children (2006), awarded “Parents of the Year” recognition to two homosexual men who had adopted a boy (2006), and recently reaffirmed his support for states that permit homosexual adoptions (2011).
ISSUE 7: Oppose supporting or commemorating “Gay Pride” or “LGBT Pride” events? Romney: NO. Documentation: As Governor, Romney issued and signed annual pro-homosexuality proclamations, stating in 2004, “Massachusetts is home to the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, which supports the Commonwealth’s gay and lesbian youth through school-based and educational programs.” In 2006, Romney’s administration issued a news release entitled, “THERE’S NO PLACE LIKE YOUTH PRIDE!” MASSACHUSETTS YOUTH PRIDE COMMITTEE TO TRANSFORM BOSTON COMMON INTO “RAINBOW CITY” FOR 12TH ANNUAL YOUTH PRIDE CELEBRATION.
ISSUE 10: Oppose teaching schoolchildren to support homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality? Romney: NO. Documentation: From his 1994 U.S. Senate campaign, to his years as Governor of Massachusetts, to the present day, Romney has supported pro-homosexuality-bisexuality-transsexuality indoctrination of schoolchildren.
“Talk is cheap and campaign promises are a little better,” said Thomasson. “But what you’ve done in the past is the most reliable indicator of what you’ll do in the future. While most of the Republican presidential candidates claim to represent family and moral values, let the actual record show they are marching to different drummers on marriage rights, adoption, schoolchildren, obscenity laws, the military, the Boy Scouts, and the homosexual-bisexual-transsexual political agenda.”
1. How can Romney be “pro-life” when 3 years after his supposed “pro-life conversion” he signed $50 abortions into law as part of his socialist healthcare plan that was endorsed by Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, and Planned Parenthood?
2. How can Romney be “pro-marriage” when he is unilaterally responsible for the illegal and unconstitutional implementation of same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts?
3. How can Romney be “pro-family” when he boosted funding for homosexual and transgender “education” starting in kindergarten?
4. How can Romney be “pro-family” when he opposes a ban on homosexual scoutmasters?
5. How can Romney oppose the gay agenda when he promised the homosexual Log Cabin Republicans he would not oppose “gay marriage” in return for their endorsement?
6. How can Romney claim to oppose ObamaCare when Romney himself signed the forerunner for ObamaCare (Romneycare which includes $50 tax subsidized abortions) into law which has been a total failure?
7. How can Romney claim to be “pro-tax cuts” and “pro-limited government” when as governor he opposed the Bush Tax Cuts (for which he was lauded by Barney Frank) and raised taxes and fees by a billion dollars which has decimated the Massachusetts economy?
8. How will Romney be expected to appoint conservative judges if elected president when as governor he passed over Republican lawyers for three quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he faced and nominated 2 open homosexuals?
9. How can Romney claim to stand for religious liberty and freedom of conscience when he supports passage of state level Employment Non-Discrimination Act which would force churches and other religious organizations to hire homosexuals and transvestites or face criminal fines and prosecution?
10. How can Romney claim to be a man of virtue and integrity when he consistently tells so many outright and easily disprovable lies? (”I saw my father march with MLK” “I”ve been a hunter pretty much my whole life” “The NRA endorsed me” etc… — Gregg Jackson
Test Your Knowledge Of Mitt Romney’s Stand On The Issues
1. Amending the Massachusetts Constitution to define marriage as one man and one woman
A. When running for Governor, Romney denounced the marriage amendment as “extreme” and refused to support it.
B. When running for President, Romney supported the marriage amendment with great enthusiasm.
C. Both A and B.
2. Homosexual Civil Unions
A. Romney stated that he has never supported homosexual civil unions.
B. Romney lobbied for a state constitutional amendment that would create homosexual civil unions.
C. Both A and B.
3. No new taxes pledge: When asked to sign a “No New Taxes” pledge,
A. Romney signed it and bragged about it in speeches.
B. Romney refused to sign it, calling it a “gimmick”.
C. Both A and B.
4. Gun control
A. Romney said “I don’t line up with the NRA. We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts. I support them. I won’t chip away at them.”
B. Romney said “I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself. I’m a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms.
C. Both A and B.
5. Balancing the Massachusetts state budget without raising personal income taxes
A. Romney balanced the budget by raising corporate taxes by $210 million.
B. Romney balanced the budget by raising fees by $500 million.
C. Both A and B.
6. Abortion: While campaigning for public office:
A. Romney told voters that he is reliably prochoice.
B. Romney told voters that he is reliably pro-life.
C. Both A and B.
7. Roe v Wade
A. Romney told voters that Roe v Wade is the law of the land and he supports it.
B. Romney told voters that Roe v Wade should be overturned, and he opposes it.
C. Both A and B.
Gingrich Defends Calling Obama ‘The Food Stamp President’ Juan Williams asked Gingrich if his comments weren’t “insulting to all Americans,” particularly, black Americans.
“They’d learn to show up for work,” Newt explained. “They could do light janitorial duties.”
Continuing with with Williams, he added, “Only the elites despise earning money.”
“More people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than by any president in American history,” Gingrich explained. “Now I know among the politically correct, you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable.”
Newt Gingrich Schools Juan Williams About Paychecks Versus Food Stamps!
Debate Crowd Erupts After Gingrich Obliterates Obama On Jobs
Though Sarah Palin Won’t Endorse, She Says If She Were A Voting South Carolinian, She Would Vote For Newt Gingrich! Speaking with host Sean Hannity, Sarah Palin, though still not endorsing any GOP candidate, would vote for Newt Gingrich because of his strong debating style if she were a South Carolinian voting in the state’s presidential primary.
Nancy Pelosi: GOP Knows Mitt Romney Can’t Win “If the far right thought that Romney could win, they might be more enthusiastic about him,” Pelosi told POLITICO’s Mike Allen. “But they question what he stands for and they don’t think he’s going to win. So what’s the sell? I’m not sure he knows what he stands for, and that makes it harder too.”
“I don’t know who knows him,” she said of Romney. “Does he know him?”
Gingrich And Juan Williams Food Stamp Exchange Brings Debate Crowd To Its Feet Newt Gingrich rigorously and rightly defends his proper recent statement that ‘black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps.’
Newt Gingrich Sharpens Case Against ‘Moderate’ Romney As Nominee; “I want to be very direct for a couple minutes,” Gingrich explained. “Unless a conservative wins on Saturday, we’re going to end up with a moderate nominee who in my judgment will have a very, very hard time defeating Barack Obama.”
“We better have someone who can draw a distinct line against Obamacare and not be confused, somebody who can draw a distinct line in favor of life and not be confused, somebody who actually has believed for more than three or four years what they currently believe and is not confused,” he further explained. “You have to have someone who is tough enough to go toe-to-toe with Barack Obama in the debates and win the debates.”
New Newt Gingrich Ad For South Carolina: Only Newt Gingrich Can Beat Obama
Newt’s Plan For America’s Enemies: “Kill Them” After Ron Paul complained about “international law” surrounding American troops killing mass-murderer and Islamofascist leader, Bin Laden, Newt Gigrich gave a different answer that was NOT what our enemies want to hear.
Bret Baier asked Newt if he were president and received actionable intelligence about Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar being in Pakistan, would he act even if it caused an end to all U.S./Pakistani cooperation. Gingrich exclaimed, “Nobody believes that bin Laden was sitting in a compound in a military city, one mile from the National Defence University, and the Pakistanis didn’t know it.” He then invoked the memory of Andrew Jackson, who Gingrich said had a “pretty good idea about America’s enemies, ‘Kill them!’”
Newt Gingrich Highlight At South Carolina Debate Last Night
Beverly LaHaye Endorses Newt Gingrich For President “It appears it will be between two front-runners, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich. I have worked along beside Speaker Gingrich and know he has a history of being a strong conservative,” LaHaye explained.
“I have chosen to back him because he supports the key issues and values that I consider most important. I believe he is most capable of defending these beliefs as he exposes the liberalism of this present president.”
“I am honored to have the endorsement of Mrs. LaHaye,” Newt Gingrich said. “She is a proven leader from within the Christian community, and our Faith Leaders Coalition will benefit immensely from her guidance and involvement.”
What Can We Learn From Newt Gingrich’s Shining Moment
“So let’s break it down one more time.
1) Directly and emphatically refute the typical preemption of categories the Left likes to engage in. “No, I don’t agree telling a hard truth is racist, sexist, bigoted, small-minded, etc…”
2) Turn it around and call them on their BS. “The fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history.”
3) Tie the issue directly to a liberal in office. “There’s an area on I-73 that was called by Barack Obama as an area of shame…”
4) Give a positive alternative to the demoralizing and insulting Leftist fecal fertilizer. “You can own that job the way Newt just owned Juan Williams.”” — Repair_Man_Jack
Why Newt Gingrich Was Cheered “New York City pays their janitors an absurd amount of money because of the union. You could take one janitor and hire 30-some kids to work in the school for the price of one janitor, and those 30 kids would be a lot less likely to drop out. They would actually have money in their pocket. They’d learn to show up for work. They could do light janitorial duty. They could work in the cafeteria. They could work in the front office. They could work in the library. They’d be getting money, which is a good thing if you’re poor. Only the elites despise earning money,” Gingrich explained.
“…Juan, the fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history. Now, I know among the politically correct, you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable,” further explained Gingrich.
Laura Ingraham Rips Mitt Romney, Praises Newt Gingrich On Debate Performance “I do believe, though, on this issue of tax returns, it does not make Romney look good to kind of hem-and-haw and say ‘well, we’re looking at it, we feel like we’ve been well-exposed, I’m going to look at it again in April,’” she said. “It just looks like a politician.”
“He rocked it,” Ingraham said of Gingrich. “I’ve never seen him better,” Ingraham said.
Ken Ard Endorses Newt Gingrich For President in 2012 S.C. Lt. Governor Ken Ard endorsed Newt Gingrich’s presidential bid.
“South Carolina voters have a marked independent spirit that cannot be swayed by other’s opinions; thus, I have never been a fan of political endorsements, and I did not plan on making any formal announcements,” Ard said in a statement.
“This morning, however, I was asked whom I would support in the upcoming primary,” Ard’s statement continued. “Though there is an exemplary field of candidates, I am certain that one, more than the rest, has the attributes necessary to become the next President of the United States and to lead our country out of this crippling economic crisis. It is crucial for our nation’s prosperity that we elect the toughest, smartest, and boldest candidate possible. That is why I will cast my vote for Newt Gingrich on Saturday.”
Courage In America: Newt Gingrich: Why’s Mitt Romney’s Waiting On Taxes? “If you’re a South Carolinian, you say, ‘Wait a second, why don’t you want me to know about it? Why are you going to wait until after I’ve voted?’ Last night he conceded in principle that he owes it to the public to share it — strikes me he ought to do it before South Carolina votes,” Gingrich explained on CBS’s “This Morning.”
“Last night, frankly, weakened him a little bit, and his refusal to release his income tax weakened him some,” said Gingrich.
“That is true for all Americans … the context was I would love to be invited by the NAACP to come to their convention because the president has particularly failed to pay attention to the tremendous amount of unemployment,” said Gingrich. We’ve had 43 percent black teenage unemployment. That’s a disaster. It sets up a social pattern where it’s very hard for young people to get jobs, get in the jobs market.”
“I think last night helped with both of them,” Gingrich said. “It’s going to be a close run, but I think we can pull it off.”
U.S. Rep. David Rivera Campaigns Hard For Gingrich Rivera is a Cuban-American who won his congressional seat in 2010 in part thanks to strong support from Cuban-American, absentee voters.
Newt Gingrich Wins South Carolina Debate, With Momentum For Strong Finish
Newt Gingrich Wins Huge Praise For South Carolina Debate “Gingrich’s performance was epic,” The Daily Caller said. “Newt delivers potentially game-changing performance.”
“It very well may have been the single best performance during any debate in the current cycle.”
The site explained that if Newt overcomes Romney and goes on to win the GOP presidential nomination, “analysts will look back and say the upset was sparked Monday night at the Myrtle Beach Convention Center.”
Pollster Frank Luntz told Fox that Gingrich’s debate performance could produce “some movement” in the polls. “I’ve never seen it in a debate — and I’ve been to debates for 16 years — a standing ovation in the middle of a debate.”
“Remember there’s only five candidates up there so you would assume that only 20 percent would award them their support. But Newt Gingrich got a standing ovation, and he did it fighting with your own Juan Williams over the whole welfare issue.”
Asked by Williams whether Gingrich could understand why his comments that “black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps” and that “poor kids lack a strong work ethic” and perhaps should “work as janitors in their schools” were insulting to Americans — especially African-Americans — Gingrich said no.
“No, I don’t see that,” he explained, the crowd responding wildly in approval.
“New York City pays their janitors an absurd amount of money because of the union. You could take one janitor and hire 30-some kids to work in the school for the price of one janitor, and those 30 kids would be a lot less likely to drop out.
“They would actually have money in their pocket. They would learn to show up for work. They could do light janitorial duty. They could work in the cafeteria. They could work in the front office. They could work in the library. They would be getting money which is a good thing if you’re poor. Only the elites despise earning money.”
Williams then asked Newt to respond to emails he got suggesting Gingrich intended to “belittle the poor and racial minorities.”
“Well, first of all, Juan, the fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history,” Gingrich explained, to more enthusiastic applause.
“Gingrich challenged him over the elites who are opposed to making money. It just lit up the audience, and they continued to applaud right into the commercial break,” Luntz said.
“It was everything that the establishment Republicans don’t want to hear and don’t want to see,” he said. “I have to say I think it was the best debate yet. It was Newt’s night, but they all did well.”
“Obama doesn’t stand a prayer, if Newt were the nominee . . . in the debates.” Luntz explained.
Gingrich later gave what the Daily Beast called “a killer rhetorical blow.”
“Bin Laden plotted deliberately, bombing American embassies,” Gingrich said, “bombing the U.S.S. Cole, and killing 3,100 Americans, and his only regret was he didn’t kill more.
“Now, he’s not a Chinese dissident. A Chinese dissident who comes here seeking freedom is not the same as a terrorist who goes to Pakistan seeking asylum. Furthermore, when you give a country $20 billion and you learn that they had been hiding — I mean nobody believes that bin Laden was sitting in a compound in a military city one mile from the national defense university and the Pakistanis didn’t know it.” The crowd gave him a rousing round of applause after that.
Gingrich Wins Debate, Gets Standing Ovation — Human Events “All voters should do their research instead of rely on the media to tell them who to vote for. I have also reviewed Gingrich’s website, read his profile on Wikipedia, reviewed his daughters comments regarding accusations made against him, and comments of aids who worked closely with him during his tenure in the House. I am convinced that he has the intellect, experience, proven legislative ability, understanding of American and Constitution values, and determination that we require to put this country back on the right course.
“True Gingrich has his spots, but he has admitted his mistakes, both in his personal and political life. But a little research indicates that of 84 charges made, only one involving writing a book or teaching a college course in violation of some house rule resulted in an agreement to forfeit the money earned. Looking at the time frame, I believe that both establishment Democrats and Republicans who were forced out of their go-along-to-get-along comfort zone were looking for any reason to remove him from the Speakers position. It seems ironic that legislatures can accept campaign donations, insider information, campaign donations, meals, travel but can’t actually earn money for rendering and educational service.
“It time that all conservative Americans recognize that we need a candidate that can not only beat Obama but will help return this Country to the values and constitutional government that we deserve. Gingrich is best qualified to do this.” — JQCitizen
Newt Gingrich Has A Nashua Moment In The S.C. Debate “My take on this is I think Newt has turned the South Carolina race on its head with this performance. It’s the kind of nightmare George H.W. Bush had to endure in 1980 that may unfold for Mitt Romney in the days to come. Even though Romney is up huge in Florida, if Gingrich pulls off a win in South Carolina with Santorum and Perry (it pains me to say that regarding Perry) likely bowing out, there will be a real two man race for the nomination. It would startle the voters in Florida and they would get curious as to why Romney lost South Carolina when everyone thought he had it wrapped up. Even worse for Romney, the excitement that Newt generated in that crowd in South Carolina could spread like a brushfire among conservatives. I’m not saying this is going to happen, but it very well could.
“Newt might be the Honey Badger but I think he’s a political Lazarus. He keeps rising from the dead.” — RealQuiet (Diary)
Gingrich Asks Santorum, Perry To Drop Out “Because We Have Got To Bring Conservatives Together” “So I am respectful that Rick has every right to run as long as he feels that’s what he should do, but from the stand point of the conservative movement, consolidating into a Gingrich candidacy would in fact virtually guarantee a victory on Saturday,” Gingrich said Tuesday in Florence. “And I’d be delighted if either Perry or Santorum wanted to do that.”
“I think I’m the only conservative, if you look at the polling, I am the only conservative who realistically has a chance to be the nominee,” Newt explained. “So any vote toward Perry or Santorum in effect is a vote to allow Romney to become the nominee. Because we have got to bring conservatives together.”
“I actually know how to set up a conservative alternative to Obama in a way that will be very, very effective and very strategic. And I don’t think Santorum can do any of that. Again, it’s not because he isn’t a nice guy. He doesn’t have any of the knowledge for how to do something like this.”
Former Romney Adviser Predicts Romney Will Lose South Carolina “There are high expectations for Romney to win a state which demographically he should not be winning,” explains Al Cardenas, who headed Hispanic outreach for Romney in the 2008 election. “I believe that for these very same reasons, it will be very difficult for Romney to win on Saturday despite polling information to the contrary.”
“South Carolina has one of the strongest Tea Party movements in America with 60-plus active chapters and a very strong evangelical [Christian] presence as well,” he said, and argued that the state “clearly represent[ed] one of Mitt’s biggest challenges.”
Juan Williams Says Gingrich Won Debate “I thought that he was very effective in playing to the audience last night,” Juan Williams admitted.” I think he won the debate, and I think he won the debate in large part because he answered the questions so effectively in a way that appealed to the political leanings of that audience.”
Get Involved! POLL: Who Won The South Carolina Debate?
Newt Gingrich: 57.15% (1,607 votes)
Rick Perry: 20.09% (565 votes)
Rick Santorum: 14.05% (395 votes)
Mitt Romney: 8.71% (245 votes)
Newt Gingrich… Saved By The Debate!
The U.S. Report: Newt Wins Myrtle (South Carolina) Debate “In my opinion, there’s no question former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich won the GOP Presidential Debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C.”
GOP Debate Reaction Round-Up “Gov. Perry and Gingrich had the best night, overall.” — Mike Flynn, Editor, BigGovernment
“Newt Gingrich won tonight’s debate. Rick Perry finished second, followed by Santorum, Romney, and Paul.” — Dana Loesch, Editor, BigJournalism
“Mitt Romney was the loser tonight–not just because he was the obvious target, but also because he botched his answers to questions about his tax returns that he must have known were coming. Worse, he made a number of claims about his tenure at Bain that invite close scrutiny–is it really true that every Bain investment was aimed at growing companies and creating jobs, for example? I thought Newt Gingrich was very good–when he wasn’t talking about Bain, which has become a liability for him even more than for Romney.” – Joel Pollak, Editor-in-Chief, Breitbart.com
The Case For Newt Gingrich “He led us to victory before. Spectacular, historic victory. The strategy and content of his 1994 Contract with America propelled the Republicans to a 54-seat gain in 1994 to win control of the House of Representatives, which had been held by the Republicans for only two out of the previous 62 years. Even the Reagan Revolution in the 1980s failed to achieve that.
“Then, for all the caterwauling we have heard about how he handled the budget battles with Clinton, he led the House Republicans in 1996 to their first re-election as a majority since 1928, almost 70 years.
“Moreover, once in power, Gingrich delivered on his promises, and maintained a solid conservative record. He carried out the Contract with America in full, holding a vote on every item as promised, most of which did pass (which was not promised). His record was unswervingly pro-life, pro-gun and Second Amendment, and anti-tax. Indeed, he worked closely with the conservative activist groups on every one of these issues.
“Gingrich’s Balanced Budget: Succeeding Where Bush Failed
Contrary to the untouched by reality liberal/left talking points about how the 1993 Clinton tax increases led to balanced budgets, when the Gingrich majority took power in 1995, it was greeted by the 1996 Clinton budget still projecting $200 billion annual budget deficits as far as the eye could see, totaling $2.7 trillion over 10 years, confirmed by CBO. The House passed a budget bill providing for $1 trillion in spending cuts over the next 10 years, and that was almost 20 years ago when $1 trillion was still real money.” — Peter Ferrara
Why I Am Endorsing Newt Gingrich For President — Steave Deace “Sadly, there are only two candidates offering a real means by which to actually undo that which the Left has done to this country for the past 50 years, and not just conservative platitudes. One of those candidates is Ron Paul, but his foreign policy is naive at best and reckless at worst. The other is Newt Gingrich, who has campaigned on what I believe is the most important issue facing us as a people—the loss of the rule of law.
“The Left has used unelected judges and judicial oligarchy to reinvent the American way of life, from secularism to the loss of the sanctity of life, to the redefining of marriage, the confiscation of private property, and the granting of imaginary rights. There is an entire chapter of my new book devoted to the need for conservatives and Christians to confront judicial oligarchy once and for all. I have spent the past two years of my radio program educating my audience on this issue, and was a vocal proponent of Iowa’s historic judicial retention election last year, and Newt’s assistance with that effort was vital.
“After offering every candidate in the race the chance to show they understand the gravity of this issue, Gingrich is the only one who has demonstrated he does, and can also use the bully pulpit of the presidency to educate Americans on the need to return to the rule of law.
“I understand Newt has taken positions and done things in his personal life I do not agree with, but to his credit he has come on my radio program and been very transparent about those things, and has shown humility and a willingness to be transparent in the process.” — Steve Deace
Why Todd Palin Endorsed Newt Gingrich
TODD PALIN: Well, watching Newt from the beginning of all the debates, I just appreciate how he got his poll numbers back up the old- fashioned way and bringing it to the debates. And the American people are impressed with his experience and message and ideas. So I just appreciated the fact that he didn’t have to spend a lot of money to do that because he wasn’t in a position to do that.
But I just felt that now would be a good time, we had a good choice in Iowa, New Hampshire is up tomorrow, and then South Carolina, but just to kind of if anything to let him know at least one Palin is behind him now.
VAN SUSTEREN: You mentioned Palin. He was out with my colleague Sean Hannity about an hour ago and he said this. He said that he had had some conversation with you, I don’t know when, but that he said Sarah said a few days ago Mitt was the weakest candidate we could put up. Your thought? Is that what the governor says is that Mitt Romney is the weakest candidate the Republicans can put up?
TODD PALIN: I’m not sure if she said that or not. She may have. But I think that, you know, we need to have the strongest candidate to go up against this machine. And again, he’s a proven reformer and he’s worked in the past with President Clinton and balance the budget. It was huge, and he can do it again.
VAN SUSTEREN: Do you expect, by the way, the governor to be making an endorsement anytime soon?
TODD PALIN: I’m not going to speak for her. You’ll have to ask her when and if she does get behind a candidate. But for right now, at least there’s one Palin behind Newt.
Tim LaHaye Endorses Newt Gingrich “During the last three years our nation has been led by liberal secularists who have tried their best to remove God from our public square and the elimination of the Biblical principles our founding fathers built this nation on” said LaHaye.
“Please prayerfully consider going to the polls on January 21 and help elect Newt Gingrich, a proven conservative who has the best chance of replacing the present occupant of the White House with a man with a proven record of appointing conservatives to office that can return this country to the constitutional principles that God has chosen to bless for over two hundred years” he said.
“It seems apparent the Republican candidates have come down to two possible winners,” LaHaye said.
“As my friend, the late Dr. Jerry Falwell told me personally, ‘Speaker Newt Gingrich is the most qualified man in America to run as president of the United States”… We agree!’”
“I am honored to have Tim’s endorsement. His work as both a minister and author is truly unmatched,” said Gingrich. “Tim will be a terrific partner for the Gingrich Faith Leaders Coalition as we work to combat the influence of radical secularism and activist judges.”
LaHaye will join the rapidly growing coalition launched yesterday, led by Christian market researcher, George Barna. It also includes Dr. Jim Garlow, the California pastor behind the Proposition 8 Battle, Congressman J.C. Watts, Don Wildmon of the American Family Association, and Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel.
The Case Against Mitt Romney “The reality is that Romney’s record may go down in history as one of the most liberal gubernatorial records compiled by any Governor of either party in modern history. Indeed, the evidence is strong that Romney can be said to be the father of gay marriage, of Cap and Trade, and of government-controlled health care. How can one have played such a key role in the promotion of three of the left’s most important issues and yet become the GOP frontrunner? That’s the million-dollar question we all should be asking ourselves.
“The standard narrative regarding Romney’s handling of the Goodridge same-sex marriage decision is that the State Supreme Court forced Romney to implement same sex marriage in Massachusetts. But that’s not what happened. Massachusetts is unique in that its state constitution specifically lists marriage as a policy area reserved to the legislative branch, but the court illegally tried to order the legislature to change the marriage statutes. However, even the liberal dominated legislature resisted the unconstitutional encroachment on its enumerated duties and refused to change the marriage statutes. Amazingly, to this day, the statutes continue to refer only to male/female marriage despite efforts made every legislative session since 2004 to change it.
“Contrary to Team Romney’s propaganda, the legislature never acted on this issue, yet Romney repeatedly referred to the court opinion as “law.” And though the court never ordered the governor to do anything, Romney came to their rescue and unilaterally ordered his Town Clerks and Justices of the Peace to marry same sex couples. Homosexual marriage exists in Massachusetts today solely due to Romney’s executive actions. This constitutes one of the most outrageous examples of executive branch activism in modern history.
“But Romney – mindful of his impending presidential campaign – pretended he was forced to implement gay marriage and called for a constitutional amendment to reverse the Goodridge decision. He was clever enough to entice national pro-family groups to hold a large rally in Boston in 2006 – near the end of his term — to push for an unnecessary and hopeless marriage amendment. As Romney expected, the rallies received great television coverage and national media attention.
“However, while Romney was being portrayed as a champion of traditional marriage, internal administration documents reveal that two years previous to the rally his administration was quietly making all the administrative changes necessary to implement same-sex marriage. This was sickening.” — Steve Baldwin
Romney To Wheelchair-Using Medical Cannabis Patient: I Don’t Support Medical Marijuana. Bye An 80 lb man with muscular dystrophy in a wheelchair is shown on the video explaining to Mitt Romney that his qualified physician believes that medical marijuana is the only medication that helps him. Mr. Romney tells him he should take synthetic marijuana, but the man explains to him that this makes him violently ill. The man then asks Romney whether he believes that he and his doctor should be arrested over medical marijuana, and Romney just turned his back on him and walked away. This is compassion?
Romney is a RINO that when asked about industrial hemp, didn’t know what it was. This is a person who seems very callous when it comes to people and their pain who use cannabis to control it. Those who continue with the EVIL, racist, counterproductive, greed-driven War on Drugs will be guilty of the innocent blood that is daily being shed to enforce it, even though the U.S. Constitution doesn’t instruct to ban products, making criminals out of ordinarily law-abiding citizens. We were given the absolute RIGHT to control our own bodies, and this includes digesting or smoking whatever we wish that does not violate the Creator-given rights of Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly of others. Cannabis has been legal about 99% of the time it has been known to mankind. A thriving hemp industry could create MILLIONS of jobs in a very short period of time, while saving our trees. Hemp is NOT a drug, but widely used in the U.S. and around the world. Newt at least said he would not arrest those who use drugs recreationally. Go Newt!
More South Carolinians Wary Of Mitt Romney’s Corporate Side “I think he [as president] would be more, basically, out for himself — and not for us,” explained Buchanan, a regional manager for Zaxby’s fast-food chicken.
“Obviously, he’s made a lot of money,” said Buchanan, who plans to vote Saturday for Newt Gingrich in South Carolina’s Republican primary. “And there’s been maybe a little bit of foul play. I don’t know that to be a fact. A lot of times, for people to get into a position that he’s in, they’ve had to step on some toes along the way, maybe bend some rules.”
“He’s got all these big-money backers — the Wall Street bankers and that kind of thing,” Deama Fulmer, a 52-year-old Republicanshe said. “I’m not really pleased with the way the country’s been run by big corporations and PACs. They don’t seem to really care about regular people.”
“He talks about creating all those jobs, but he fired as many as he hired, it looks like,” said Boozer, a retired truck driver.
“I feel like he’s a little too ‘big corporation,’ ” Poole said. “Down here, we’re more into the smaller guys than the bigger guys.”
Michael Youssef, pastor of Atlanta’s Church of the Apostles, Defends Newt Gingrich “Newt Gingrich is trying to heal our nation not divide it,” Michael Youssef, pastor of Atlanta’s Church of the Apostles, expalined. “If he were to lead this nation, the poor, the unemployed and the homeless might find hope and a new direction as we see our nation healed. There is nothing racial or racist about wanting to turn around our economy and help those without work find jobs and support their families. I commend him for it,” Youssef said in an emailed statement.
Youssef even issued an additional followup statement.
“I’m not sure what playbook they are talking about when you consider black unemployment is off the charts,” he said in the statement. “Too many Americans, especially minorities, are suffering because of a lack of leadership by the Obama administration.”
“Newt’s concrete ideas to turn our economy around will create jobs and allow people to start supporting their families again. Every individual without a job would rather cash a paycheck than have food stamps in their wallet. Newt wants all Americans to have the opportunity to find a job,” Youssef added.
Four Evangelical Leaders Reaffirm Support For Gingrich “It is unfortunate that early press reports incorrectly stated that there was a consensus for Santorum, or that the ’150 leaders endorsed Santorum.’ Such was not the case. Many there were and still are for Newt Gingrich,” said a statement issued Monday by J.C. Watts, a leading African-American conservative, George Barna, a prominent Christian political analyst, the Rev. Jim Garlow, pastor and a leader of the campaign against same-sex marriage, and Richard Lee, a prominent Baptist pastor in Atlanta.
“While we truly respect both Rick Santorum and Rick Perry, we believe Newt Gingrich to be the only candidate that has the intellectual strength and the capacity to stop the left’s attack on morality, the economy, basic freedoms and our religious liberty.”
The statement added: “In addition Mr. Gingrich is the social conservative that has the capacity to raise funds and produce a national organization that would allow him to compete with and defeat Barak Obama. For the sake of the nation, we remain steadfastly committed to Newt Gingrich.”
Gingrich Rebounds In South Carolina, Receives Rep. J.C. Watts’ Endorsement Gingrich and members of his staff descended the steps from the doors of the South Carolina Statehouse last Thursday to greet a cheering crowd after a rousing endorsement from former Oklahoma Republican Congressman J.C. Watts.
Only 9 Votes Seperated Newt Gingrich From Santorum In First Ballotd “The media is misrepresenting the result of the meeting of Christian conservative leaders in Texas. Only 9 votes separated Gingrich and Santorum on the first …”
Awakening To Ron Paul’s Crony Capitalism “What is relevant is Ron Paul’s role in herding the stray sheep of politics, upset at the Republicans or Democrats, towards a false paradigm of economics. What is important is how brainwashed, militant, and intellectually dishonest these supporters of Ron Paul are. They resemble fascists, promoting a crony capitalism which resembles a new type of feudalism, while calling themselves defenders of capitalism, free markets, and classical liberalism. They do not listen to what you have to say. They are not there to learn. They are there to beat a drum of free markets and anarchy while at the same time they promote corruption of free markets by the government, without even being aware that is what they are doing. You can’t even crack a joke about Ron Paul without them going ballistic.
“Some people defend Ron Paul on the basis that he is a gateway to the proverbial red pill from The Matrix. This is somewhat true. I was a card-carrying member of the Libertarian Party until I left the party in 2001, mostly because I felt it had a brainwashing effect. I was amazed at Ron Paul’s popularity during the 2008 elections. I started to poke around YouTube to find out why he became so popular. What I discovered was people talking about the CFR, 9/11, the New World Order, and Alex Jones.
“It was an interesting journey. It took me awhile to come to terms that 9/11 was an inside job. I did not want to believe that it was possible for such to be an inside job. However, the hard science and all the soft evidence indicated it could have been nothing else but controlled-demolition. Alex Jones opened me up to a lot of things. After I predicted the collapse of the Dow and the swine flu outbreak, I stopped listening to Alex Jones. I had watched Zeitgeist and Bill Still’s documentary and started to really think about monetary policy. This is when it finally hit me that Ron Paul was a Benedict Arnold.” — Keith Gardner
Ron Paul Is Truly Dangerous “A Wall Street Journal columnist notes that Paul is “a leading spokesman for, and recycler of, the long and familiar litany of charges that point to the United States as a leading agent of evil and injustice, the militarist victimizer of millions who want only to live in peace.”
“Perhaps this warped view is why Paul believes that al-Qaida terrorists caught in the United States ought to be treated as common criminals, not enemy combatants. He wants them read Miranda rights to which they are not entitled and he wants them tried and sentenced in civil courts rather than by military tribunals.
“This is nothing short of nuts. What is needed to competently fight a war, and al-Qaida is indeed at war with us, is the ability to gather information. Telling the enemy that it has a “right to remain silent” is absurd.
“Paul believes that if a U.S. citizen throws in with al-Qaida or associated groups overseas, where he plots American death and destruction, we need to somehow find him, arrest him, and bring him back to stand civil trial here rather than eliminate him, even if that is the only option.
“We are in a much different kind of war than we have ever faced, but Paul doesn’t see it. He has repeatedly said that U.S. aggression is responsible for 9-11 and other attacks on America from radical jihadists.
“He has repeatedly said that we should allow Iran to continue to develop a nuclear weapon. This is the same country whose leadership vows death to America, the “Satanic power,” and who wants Israel wiped from the map.
“Never mind Paul being the favored candidate of the lunatic fringe (see white supremacists, anti-Semites, truthers, etc.). Never mind his refusal to disavow a third-party run (which would only help President Obama’s reelection).
“His defenders say they admire Ron Paul’s “consistency.” It is true, Paul has been consistently spouting this nonsense.” — JOSEPH W. McQUAID
Gingrich To Conservatives: Vote For Newt Over Santorum, “The Only Candidate Capable Of Stopping A Moderate From Winning The Nomination” “Any Conservative who votes for anyone but Newt helps elect a moderate as the nominee.”
“Ask yourself this simple question: Why would you want to nominate the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?”
“The only reason [Romney] is electable right now is because he has raised more money from Wall Street to buy more ads than anybody else in the race, and we’re not going to win that game,” Gingrich said. “If you count how much money you can raise as the number one test of electability, Obama’s going to drown him.”
“If you’re a conservative, just look at the polls. I am the only candidate capable of stopping a moderate from winning the nomination,” explained Newt.
“Evangelical voters would like to have a nominee that will win a general election, and somebody who set the all time Pennsylvania record for the size of their defeat has a harder case to make as to why they could be elected,” Gingrich told reporters.
“If you vote for Sen. Santorum, in effect you’re voting for Gov. Romney to be the nominee because he’s not going to beat him. And the only way you can stop Gov. Romney for all practical purposes is to vote for Gingrich. That’s just a fact and it’s a mathematical fact now.”
Newt Gingrich: “A Reagan Conservative Tough Enough And Strong Enough To Stand Up To [President] Obama And Then To Stand Up To Washington” “The key question we have to decide on Saturday is whether we’re going to nominate, from South Carolina, a Reagan conservative tough enough and strong enough to stand up to [President] Obama and then to stand up to Washington. Or whether we’re going to have conservatives split three ways and nominate somebody who had no history in Boston of changing the culture of Massachusetts at all,” Gingrich said.
“To do that, we have to unify the tea parties and we have to unify the conservatives in a very straight forward way.”
Tea Party Slams Romney, While Activist Michael George Explains: “The Tea Party Must Join Behind One Candidate Or Romney Will Win The Nomination And Obama Will Win” Speaking to the crowd, Texas-based activist Michael GeorgeGeorge blasted Romney, claiming the candidate still defends “Romneycare.”
“There’s only one person who can beat Obama in debates and that’s Newt Gingrich,” George explained. “Romney’s going to lose to Obama…That’s my view.”
George showed the large image with about a dozen dead seals laying lifeless in bloody waters, with a seal hunter grinning in the middle of the image.
The caption read: “If the seals had joined, they could kill the hunter. They were divided and he clubbed each to death.”
“The Tea Party must join behind one candidate or Romney will win the nomination and Obama will win.”
Like this:
Filed under: Newt Gingrich, Newt Gingrich For President 2012 Tagged: | Newt Gingrich, Newt Gingrich For President 2012
Calling obama the food stamp president is like blaming my body for clotting blood to a wound. Its the function of it. Cause and effect.
Blaming Obama for what he said would be no more than 8% unemployment and his supposed attempts since then at getting real unemployment down, which is about twice the rate than the stated unemployment rate, is what he gets.
He told us his economic policies were superior to Bush’s economic policies, and that they would not FAIL, but they have FAILED. Keynesian Economics ALWAYS fails, since the aggregate amount of dollars put into the Federal Government is ALWAYS lower — and many times SUBSTANTIALLY LOWER because of waste, abuse and fraud — than the amount put into it, contrary to Nancy Pelosi’s claim that economists say the best bang for your buck is UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION and FOOD STAMPS!
Of course the rest lies with President Obama by his very own mouth, and statistics show that the result is that he is now the Food Stamp President!
A nation of sheep shall be ruled by PIGS.
That’s exactly what Mitt Romney is,—————a PIG!
Newt Gingrich can turn a question, a questioner and a falsehood around because he has the intellect, wisdom, tenacity and foresight to know how to handle truth versus lies, and because he, I believe, cares deeply FOR America.
I thought Newt Gingrich won virtually all the GOP debates with an extremely strong, sound, intelligent and detailed set of arguments FOR the continuation of the Reagan Revolution, which was derailed by the Establishment Republican folks, like “read my lips no new taxes” Mr. Bush Sr. Newt Gingrich schooled Juan Williams and John King in the debate, went and exposed himself to a hostile black congregation that supports Obama, is going to follow President Obama around as our nominee until Obama agrees to 7 Lincoln-style debates, and will school Obama in those debates and win the election, in my opinion. Newt has done great things FOR America, like Welfare Reform and balancing her budgets, along with helping create an environment that created over 20 million jobs through the Reagan and Clinton presidencies. He has worked across the aisle to get great things done FOR America, and if given the chance, he will do it again, restoring America to its exceptionalism once more. Go Newt!
MITT ROMNEY doesn’t have a Conservative message. Newt Gingrich does! All Romney can do is deflect attacks.
Mitt has changed positions on every foundational issue important to conservatives.
ROMNEY spent his entire career governing as the most pro-gay, pro-abortion Socialist across the nation.
The Republican base, conservatives and Christians won’t vote for MITT ROMNEY! ROMNEY won’t beat Obama,– he will kill the Republican base and split our party!
If MITT ROMNEY gets the Republican nomination,————the GOP is not the party of conservatism and they deserve to LOSE!
I must admit I concur with your sentiments. The GOP may be finished if they elect Romney as their nominee. Many of us simply cannot and WILL NOT support the pro-homosexual, Big Government Romney. A third party candidate will probably enter giving Obama second term, and the nation will go to Hell. Go Newt!
Denny,
Des Moines Register this morning reporting the Iowa Caucus count was wrong! Santorum WON by 34 votes! MITT ROMNEY didn’t win in Iowa!
Denny, that’s called VOTER FRAUD! The GOP is willing to STEAL the nomination for MITT ROMNEY!!
MITT ROMNEY didn’t win in Iowa and FOX NEWS isn’t even reporting it! CNN is reporting it. I’m done with FOX NEWS, nothing fair and balenced about them!!
ROMNEY didn’t WIN IOWA!
NEWT GINGRICH is gaining big time in the polls!
Rick Perry is endorsing NEWT GINGRICH! WOOW, Woow! GO NEWT,——-GO NEWT!
Denny must be in California eating moon pies while NEWT WINS! GO NEWT!!
Santorum needs to drop out of this and get behind Newt Gingrich! NEWT would WIN this if our conservative vote wasn’t split!
I hope and pray that others would do the same and ask the Creator to get Rick Santorum to drop out ASAP so that Newt Gingrich can beat RINO Romney, the Father of Homosexual Marriage in America. I also hope that others will pray to the Creator that Herman Cain, Michelle Bachmann and others would come forward and endorse Newt For President ASAP. Go Newt!
I’m praying for VICTORY!
You better be praying too Denny! Perhaps you should fast for a couple weeks that would help too!!
If I felt led to fast I would. I do not. I have, however, prayed and worked hard to try to elect Newt Gingrich as the GOP presidential nominee.
On another topic, did you see the despicable thing RINO Romney has done by sending a cake to commemorate Nancy Pelosi’s and the Democratic Party’s attack on Newt Gingrich with dozens of unfounded so-called “ethics” violations smeared against Newt for HIS CONSERVATIVE VIEWS? I also have prayed that the YAHUAH would keep letting people give Romney bad advise that Mitt then follows, and that Mr. Romney would reject sound advice so that he is no longer a threat to American politics.
I curse MITT ROMNEY in the name of Jesus Christ. America doesn’t need this UNGODLY man leading it. We don’t need the father of gay marriage leading our country.
Mitt Romney is a FAKE, —–a FRAUD and a LIAR! Romney is an AntiChristian FAKE!
I refute your curse, since vengeance is of Elohim, and the Creator’s children are NOT to curse, but to oppose evil and the spirit of those that are committed to evil. But we are to bless those who curse us and pray for those that abuse/use us. We oppose them with force if fighting for a just war effort is called upon us, and we use self-defense if justification can be equaled against others, and we call evil and those who commit repeated evil or gross evil names that equate their deeds. Yahusha became a curse for us, and as a Perfect Sacrifice for our sins, whosoever can be saved by being baptized in the Name of Yahusha for the remission of sins and the receiving of the Spirit of Elohim to become born-again of the Spirit of Yahusha.
Realize that for nearly 1,500 years AFTER the Messiah walked the earth, the world had NEVER HEARD the name “Jesus.” The sound of the letter (j) has NEVER existed in the Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek or Latin languages! And these are the languages in which the Scriptures were recorded!
Before the 12th century, the letter (j) didn’t even exist in the Old English language. The new sound caused the letters (I) and (Y) in the English language to be replaced with (j), also causing male names that began with (I) or (Y) to be replaced with the j because the hard sound was considered more masculine. So, names like “Iames” became “James”, “Yohan” became “John,” and so on.
Then in 1384, John Wycliffe translated the New Testament into English for the first time, his only source being the Latin Vulgate. Wycliffe continued to use the Latin spelling and pronunciation “Iesus.” Tyndale translated the New Testament into the English language of the common people and was the first to use the letter (j) in the spelling of Messiah’s Name, rendering it “Jesus.” And about the same time, Spanish-speaking people took this same English spelling and pronounced it “Hay-soos”(which is an accurate pronunciation of the Greek spelling).
The King James Version of 1611 rendered every name in the scripture that begins with the letter (J), thus we have has ”Jeremiah,” “Jerusalem,” “Judah,” “Jordan” River, ”Jew,” etc.
Now realize that soos is a legitimate Hebrew word! The name Jesus transliterated into Hebrew is “yay-soos.” The following three verses will show the word soos being used in its original and true form, and it does NOT mean salvation, but rather ”horse!”
Ps.33:17: “The horse (Heb. hey-soos) is a vain hope for safety; neither shall it deliver any by its great strength.”
“Neither is there Salvation in any other. For there is NO other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” – Acts 4:12
If your like almost all followers of Messiah, you have been baptized into the name of “Jesus” (many have been baptized in “the name of the Father and the Son and the ‘Holy Spirit.’” But What is the Father’s Name? The “Holy Spirit” is NOT a person like we have been taught, but is the Ruach Ha Kodesh OF Elohim), but what exactly does this name mean, and where did it come from?
If one looks at the picture of the 1599 Geneva scriptures below, you will see the name “Iesvs.” This is Latin and sounds like “hey-soos.”
But the Latin is taken from the Greek name Iesous, which can be pronounced “ee-ay-soos.” or Yay-soos.” And where did they get the Greek name from? Well, the Latin name “Iesvs” came from the GREEK name “Iesous,” which came from the corrupted Hebrew name “Yeshua,” which came from the corrupted name of “Yehowshuwah,” which came from what I believe is the real Transliteration of the Name of the Messiah, which is “Yahusha.”
Let’s start off with the name of the Messiah first to get a foundational understanding of what His Name should be.
“I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.” John 5:43
“Kodesh Father, keep them in thy name, which thou hast given me, that they may be one, even as we are one. While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.” John 17:11,12
“I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word.” John 17:6
But what is the Name of the Father? Is it “God” or “LORD” or “Jehovah?” NO! God is a title and can mean any god, while LORD means “BA’AL” in Hebrew, and Jehovah is not even Hebrew or Greek, and therefore cannot be a correct transliteration of the Father’s Name.
You see, the practice of substituting the real Name of the Father, which is YHWH (Tetragrammaton [from Greek τετραγράμματον, meaning "{a word} having four letters" [Hebrew: יהוה], for the term ”LORD” was begun by the Jews hundreds of years before Christ. The Jews did not want to pronounce or mispronounce the name of YHWH out of reverence, and also because they did not want to violate the commandment that says, “You shall not take the name of Adonai your Elohim in vain, for Adonai will not leave him unpunished who takes His name in vain.”
But many Scriptures tell us to remember and proclaim the Father’s Name, and the scriptures only warn against “misuse”, “blaspheming” or in ordinary terms, “taking lightly” the Name of YHWH. The scriptural texts strongly suggests that the people of the scriptures—including the patriarchs—used the Name of YHWH, with a wealth of scriptures supporting this notion.
Instead of using YHWH, the scribes simply put the words “LORD” or “LORD God” to hide the Father’s Name. The title of YHWH is “Elohim,” and this word was replaced by the word “God” over 6,000 times.
We read in the book of Revelation: “and yet you have kept my word and HAVE NOT DENIED MY NAME.” Rev. 3:8
So, if Messiah came in His Father’s Name, and there is NO other Name by which men can be saved, and we are instructed to NOT deny Messiah’s Name, we had better find out what His Name is!
“…Behold, the LYING pen of the SCRIBES has certainly worked deceit and WRITTEN them WRONG. The wise are ashamed; they are terrified and are captured.” Jeremiah 8:8
There is only ONE word for “horse” in Hebrew, which in Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance is Hebrew word #5483 “soos.” It is used a total of 34 times in the Old Testament. ”Hey” in Hebrew means “the,” “Soos” in Hebrew means “horse,” so Hey-soos literally means: “THE HORSE!”
Hebrew is the language of the Father and all the heavenly host, with the Savior’s Name coming from YHWH’s throne in heaven. And the Hebrew-speaking Apostles NEVER called their Messiah “soos” – HORSE! So, just so we are all aware, ‘soos’ does not mean Savior, nor salvation, nor deliverance – it means: HORSE.
So, to recap, “Jesus” is derived from Strong’s Greek #2424 Iesous, pronounced yay-soos, which the ‘soos’ is the Hebrew word for “horse.” And remember that the Apostle Paul heard the heavenly messenger of the Messiah say in Hebrew “soos” each time one of the horses was mentioned of we hear in the book of Revelation.
“But I say to you that EVERY idle WORD men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of JUDGMENT. For by your WORDS will you be justified, and by your WORDS will you be condemned.” Matt.12:36-37
Now Messiah said He came in His Father’s Name which is YHWH, but how do we pronounce this Name? Many think it to be “Yahweh,” but this is incorrect, although it DOES contain the abbreviate Name of the Father. The following three verses give the abbreviated Name of YHWH.
“I said, ‘I won’t see Yah, Yah in the land of the living. I will see man no more with the inhabitants of the world.’” Isaiah 38:11 World English
“But we will bless Yah, from this time forth and forevermore. Praise Yah!” Psalms 115:8 World English
“Let everything that has breath praise Yah! Praise Yah!” Psalms 150:6 World English
And the YHWH has kept His abbreviated Name throughout the thousands of years in the word halelluYAH! The first part of this word is hallel in Hebrew, and it just doesn’t mean to “praise,” but means a JOYOUS praise in song, to BOAST in YHWH. The second part of the word is Yah (Jah in some renderings), and is the first two letter of YHWH. HalelluYah is PRONOUNCED the same in 2,400 languages and means to bring a joyous praise to Yah and is found 24 times in the Hebrew scriptures.
Now if you look up the name “Jesus” in the Strong’s lexicon it has “Iesous”:
“2424 Iesous ee-ay-sooce’ of Hebrew origin (3091)”
Here are the KJB concordance numbers: “These428 are the names8034 of the men376 which834 Moses4872 sent7971 to spy out8446 (853) the land.776 And Moses4872 called7121 Oshea1954 the son1121 of Nun5126 Joshua.3091”
It traces the name of Messiah to Hebrew word #3091 in the Strong’s lexicon, which is the same name as “Joshua, Son of Nun.” It is important here to note that a Greek transliteration of the Hebrew scriptures that was completed many years before Messiah came to earth rendered the Hebrew name “Yahushua” as IhsouV (Iesous). There is also evidence that although the name of the Messiah was written in Greek as IhsouV, it may have actually been pronounced the way a Hebrew speaking person would pronounce it. Around 178 CE, a pagan by the name of Celsus engaged in written debates with Believers, in one of them saying of Believers:
“But of course they think otherwise: they assume that by pronouncing the name of their teacher they are armored against the powers of the earth and air. And they are quite insistent on the efficacy of the name as a means of protection: pronounce it improperly, they say, and it is ineffective. Greek and Latin will not do; it must be said in a barbarian tongue to work. Silly as they are, one finds them standing next to a statue of Zeus or Apollo or some other god, and shouting, “see here: I blaspheme it and strike it, but it is powerless against me for I am a Christian.”
The pagans thought that the Hebrew language was nothing more than a barbarian language.
In the Strong’s concordance and other Hebrew Lexicons, the pronunciation listed for the Messiah’s name is typically “Yehoshua.” But the reason for the “Yehoshua” pronunciation is due to the Hebrew vowel pointing added by the Masorite scribes, which are the little dots and dashes under and above certain Hebrew letters. Hebrew was written with mostly all consonants and it was up to the reader to supply the vowels in each word based on the context of the word. Since they didn’t want people to say the Heavenly Father’s name, they pointed the Heavenly Father’s name to produce the sound “Yehovah.”
HWH are the Hebrew letters Yod, Hay, Uau(waw) and Hay. As we have already learned, the first two letter are pronounced “Yah,” as in halelluYah! There is no letter “W” in the Hebrew, and the letter “double-U” came into existence in only parts of western Europe during the 13th century. The Hebrew letter commonly seen as “waw” is more accurately expressed as a “UAU,” since it conveys the sound of “U,” and sometimes “O.” When the letter “hay” is followed by a “uau,” the sound is to be “OO,” as we hear in the word ”halleluYah.” That “u” sound you hear in “halleluYah” is the letter “uau.” The tribe of Judah is actually “YAHUDAH” and is spelled YOD-HAY-UAU-DALETH-HAY.
Notice the four letters in this five-lettered word. It’s as simple as saying “YAHUDAH” without the sound of the letter “D”: YAHUAH. So, the Name of the Father is “Yahuah.”
The Name of the Son is the same as that of Joshua son of Nun(#3091), which is YOD-HAY-UAU-SHIN-AYIN, and is transliterated as Yahusha, and YOD-HAY-UAU-SHIN-UAU-AYIN, and is transliterated as Yahushua. Yahusha is 216 times in scripture, while Yahushua is found 2 times in scripture. In Deuteronomy, Yahusha is used 7 times, while Yahushua is used once. In Judges, Yahusha is used 5 times, while Yahushua is used once.
Yah means “I Am,” while SHUA and SHA both contain the Hebrew root, yaSHA, meaning deliverance. So Yahusha means, “I Am your Deliverer!” Yahusha did in FACT come in His Father’s Name!
“But while he thought on these things, behold, the Messenger of Yahuah appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Yoseph, you son of David, fear not to take unto you Miryam (Mary) your wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the (Ruach Ha Kodesh=’Holy Spirit’ OF Yahuah). And she shall bring forth a son, and you shall call His Name Yahusha: for He shall deliver His people from their sins. Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of Yahuah by the prophet, saying,
‘Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel’, which being interpreted is, (Eloah) with us. Then Yoseph being raised from sleep did as the Messenger of Yahuah) had bidden him, and took unto him his wife: And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Yahusha.”
It is important to note that the form “YESHUA” has been adapted to form the acronym “YESHU,” a mutilation of Yahusha’s Name used by unbelieving Yahudim during the late 1st and 2nd century CE. The letters in “YESHU” stood for the sentence, “may his name be blotted out“ (from the scroll of life). This “Yeshu” acronym is the real root of the form “JESUS”, after going through Greek, then Latin.
“And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying IN THE HEBREW TONGUE, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks, And I said, Who art thou, Adonai?. And he said, I am Yahusha whom thou persecutest.” Act 26:14,15
“My covenant I will not break, nor alter the word that has gone out of My lips.” Ps.89:34
“Take silver and gold; make an elaborate crown, and set it on the head of YAHSHA (Heb#3091)…Then speak to Him saying, Thus says YHWH of hosts, saying, Behold the MAN who is the BRANCH. From his place he shall branch out, and He shall build the temple of YHWH.”
“Take heed to all that I have said to you, and make no mention of the names of other gods, nor let such be heard out of your mouths.” Exodus 23:13
…You are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures, nor the Power of YHWH.” Matt.22:29
“I am YHWH, that is my Name; my glory I give to no other, nor my praise to graven images.”
“The Remnant of YHWH shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies, and a deceitful tongue shall not be found in their mouth.” Zephanyah 3:13
Acts 2:38 “Then Peter said to them, ‘Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Yahusha Messiah for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Ruach Ha Kodesh.”
Acts 3:6 Then Peter said, “Silver and gold I do not have, but what I do have I give you: In the name of Yahusha Messiah of Nazareth, rise up and walk.”
Acts 3:16 “And His name, through faith in His name, has made this man strong, whom you see and know. Yes, the faith which [comes] through Him has given him this perfect soundness in the presence of you all.”
Acts 4:7 And when they had set them in the midst, they asked, “By what power or by what name have you done this?”
Acts 4:10 “let it be known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Yahusha Messiah of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom Elohim raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before you whole.”
Acts 4:17,18 “‘But so that it spreads no further among the people, let us severely threaten them, that from now on they speak to no man in this name.’ And they called them and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Yahusha.”
Acts 4:30 “by stretching out Your hand to heal, and that signs and wonders may be done through the name of Your Kodesh Servant Yahusha.”
Acts 5:28 saying, “Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this Man’s blood on us!”
Acts 5:40,41 “And they agreed with him, and when they had called for the apostles and beaten [them], they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Yahusha, and let them go. So they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name.”
Acts 8:12 “But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of Elohim and the name of Yahusha Messiah, both men and women were baptized.”
Acts 8:16 “For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptized in the name of the Master Yahusha.”
Acts 9:14-16 “And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on Your name. But the Master said to him, ‘Go, for he is a chosen vessel of Mine to bear My name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel. For I will show him how many things he must suffer for My name’s sake.’”
Acts 9:21 “Then all who heard were amazed, and said, ‘Is this not he who destroyed those who called on this name in Jerusalem, and has come here for that purpose, so that he might bring them bound to the chief priests?’”
Acts 9:27 “But Barnabas took him and brought [him] to the apostles. And he declared to them how he had seen the Master on the road, and that He had spoken to him, and how he had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Yahusha.”
Acts 9:29 “And he spoke boldly in the name of the Master Yahusha and disputed against the Hellenists, but they attempted to kill him.”
Acts 10:43 “To Him all the prophets witness that, through His name, whoever believes in Him will receive remission of sins.”
Acts 15:14 “Simon has declared how Elohim at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name.
Acts 15:26 “men who have risked their lives for the name of our Master Yahusha Messiah.”
Acts 16:18 “And this she did for many days. But Paul, greatly annoyed, turned and said to the spirit, ‘I command you in the name of Yahusha Messiah to come out of her.’ And he came out that very hour.”
Acts 19:5 “When they heard [this], they were baptized in the name of the Master Yahusha.”
Acts 19:13 “Then some of the itinerant Jewish exorcists took it upon themselves to call the name of the Master Yahusha over those who had evil spirits, saying, ‘We exorcise you by the Yahusha whom Paul preaches.’”
Acts 19:17 “This became known both to all Jews and Greeks dwelling in Ephesus; and fear fell on them all, and THE NAME OF THE MASTER YAHUSHA WAS MAGNIFIED.”
Acts 21:13 “Then Paul answered, ‘What do you mean by weeping and breaking my heart? For I am ready not only to be bound, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Master Yahusha.’”
I know this is long, but since you used my blog for your curse, I felt led to inform whosoever who reads this the truth. Thanks for listening, 777denny Go Newt!
I’m feeling like NEWT GINGRICH is going to WIN!
Your right, Gingrich DID win!
As you may recall, Newt Gingrich worked with Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton to help to create conditions for the creation of over 25 million jobs, worked with Clinton to balance 4 budgets and reform welfare, and helped to CONTINUE the Reagan Revolution, where Mitt Romney repudiated it and ran as a “Progressive” that tried to outdo Ted Kennedy on promoting homosexuality, which he did by becoming the Father of Homosexual Marriage in America, all the while governing to the Left, then running for the GOP nomination in 2008 talking to the Right and ACTING like a Conservative. Heck, he was the FIRST to kick the Boy Scouts of America out of the Olympics, even though about 2,000 or more cases of Troop Leaders molesting boys had already been made public. If you want a true Conservative to go up against Saul Alinsky Radical Barack Hussein Obama, then Newt is your candidate, who will also follow Obama around until he agree’s to SEVEN Lincoln-style debates where I believe Newt will WIN and become the President-elect in 2012. Go Newt!
I agree with you 100% on everything you have said about Mitt Romney. And I support Newt.
But My God don’t put your hopes and dreams in politicians and man. The only hopes for any of us in this world is JESUS CHRIST! JESUS CHRIST! JESUS CHRIST!
I’m a Bible-believing Christian and I won’t be silenced or intimidated from speaking out.
I’m a Christian with Biblical values and standards of morality, marriage, family and Christianity. There is no need for you to ridicul and defame me by calling me evil.
I defend what Americans have always stood for.
Men like MITT ROMNEY will bring GOD’S hot wrath to America. Just like GOD Destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.
I curse MITT ROMNEY in the name of JESUS CHRIST! I curse him to the bottomless pit where the fire is not quenched and the worm dieth not. The lake of fire will burn forever and ever. It will burn as long as the world exists, forever and ever, as long as the age lasts it will burn,—forever and ever to the end of the age.
I have never seen a Presidential candidate beat up the way Newt Gingrich has been done!
FOX NEWS, the liberal media, establishment Republican talking heads like John Sununu and Carl Rove constantly trash all the conservative candidates,—- except MITT ROMNEY he has a free pass! It pisses me off!
You can’t watch FOX NEWS for 5 minutes without them talking about MITT ROMNEY!
The future,—– the establishment Republicans will pick the man they want for President from now on. Last election it was the Dem, John McCain. This election it’s the Hitler era Socialist MITT ROMNEY!
I’m done with the Republican party for good if MITT ROMNEY is their candidate!
Voting for MITT ROMNEY alone will give Obama another 4 years. Only Newt can beat Obama!
Greg F, my sentiments exactly! Go Newt!