Obama’s Mentor, Rev. Wright, Charges Attacks Against Him Are Really Against the “Black Church”







Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s ex-pastor, has been on a tour going around America trying to defend his controversial statements that most Americans have heard and found very disturbing. He has, in the process, made some more incendiary statements, digging a hole for himself that is even deeper than it was just four short days ago.

At the National Press Club in Washington DC, he defended his “chickens come home to roost” statement about 9/11 saying, “You cannot do terrorism on other people and expect it never to come back on you.” He defended his damnation of America and his accusation that the U.S. government had created AIDS to decimate the black population: “I believe our government is capable of doing anything.”

Asked about his comments on PBS’ “Bill Moyers’ Journal about Obama’s race speech in Philadelphia where he condemned some of Wrights remarks, Wright said, “He had to distance himself because he’s a politician…Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls.” He also said: “If Obama had not said what he said he would never get elected.” Then Wright added, “I’m not running for office . . .I’m hoping to be V.P.”

Before a question and answer session Wright opened his less than 15 minute speech by referring to the media’s playing of the “out of context” sound bites saying, “It’s not an attack on Jeremiah Wright. It is an attack on the Black Church.”

When asked about his relationship with Louis Farrakhan, head of the Nation of Islam, Wright said, “Farrakhan and I don’t agree on everything. Farrakhan is one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st centuries. I won’t put down Farrakhan any more than (Nelson) Mandela would put down Castro.”

Wright was asked the following question: “Jesus said, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man cometh unto the father but through me.’ Do you believe this? And do you think Islam is a way to salvation?” Wright answered by saying, “Jesus also said, ‘Other sheep have I who are not of this fold.’”

When asked how the Black and White church could reconcile, he said that many have already “taken great steps to do so. To reconcile, whites must understand the injustice that was done.”

Several protesters, some from a Jewish group, were outside the event to criticize Wright’s longtime friendship with Farrakhan, who has made disparaging remarks about Israel.

“He said Zionism, not Judaism, was a gutter religion,” Wright said referring to Farrakhan.

Obama, speaking in Wilmington, N.C., said his ex-pastor’s views “offend” many people and don’t reflect his own.

“I don’t know why he’s doing this to his friend … he’s seriously hurting Obama,” said Stu Rothenberg, an independent political analyst.

I can only assume that Jeremiah Wright’s top agenda is helping Jeremiah Wright,” he said. “It’s already done the damage. It’s something for those older white working-class downscale people to latch onto in voting against Obama.”

But Marion Barry, the former mayor of Washington, D.C., loved Wright’s speech. “It was a brilliant speech,” he told Byron York, NR White House Correspondent after Wright’s appearance at the National Press Club Monday morning. “I’ve read his sermons, I’ve been to his church, so I know about him. It’s very clear most Americans only know Jeremiah Wright through those 15-second soundbites, which is ridiculous.”

But Stanley Kurtz of the Ethics and Public Policy Center reports in the latest National Review, Trinity United Church of Christ “is arguably the most radical black church in the country.”

Fred Barnes, executive editor of the ‘Weekly Standard’ on FOX News ‘Special Report’ said: “Bill Clinton isn’t going to do as much damage to Barack Obama as Reverend Jeremiah Wright is. With the pastor like this, you don’t need enemies. This guy — there is no way he can help Obama.”

Charles Krauthammer, a syndicated columnist, said this: ” What is really hard for Obama is that he gave the speech after the furor erupted last month, and many in the press accepted the speech as the final word on this issue and have treated any reviving of the Wright issue as illegitimate and even racist.”

He added that “the problem for Obama is if Wright reappears and speaks, its now real news again. So you can no longer hide him under the rung.” Speaking about Wright’s stint on the Moyer’s show, he also found it “amazing” that “Wright explained his statements by saying they were taken out of context. I don’t know how Moyer responded, but what context exactly would you place the statement that white America, the government, has created the AIDS virus and used it to commit genocide on people of color?”

McCain’s chief strategist, Steve Schmidt, told The Chronicle on Monday that McCain “has made his position clear on this; he isn’t going to be taking on this issue in speeches.”

“He’s not going to be running ads about how he’s offended by the comments - but he understands there’s tens of millions who are,” Schmidt said. “Those Americans will have questions for Sen. Obama … and the answers that he provides, or doesn’t provide, are between him and the American people.”

Bob Gardner, who heads San Francisco’s Advocacy Group, referred to Wright as a “bad penny” that keeps coming back and excalating Obama’s troubles.

“It puts Obamain a corner. He’s made some negative comments about (Wright), but not totally disassociated himself with him,” said Gardner.

“Now … there’s a tough decision ahead - he has to say he made a terrible mistake by staying in the congregation for 20 years, and he didn’t realize what a nutcase (Wright) was, or he’ll have to ignore it,” he said.

BTW, just days after 9/11 Wright said, “America’s chickens are coming home to roost. Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred, and terrorism begets terrorism. A white ambassador said that y’all — not a black militant. Not a reverend who preaches about racism.”

The problem with Wright’s assertion is that Ambassador Peck never said “America’s chickens are coming home to roost” — nor did he suggest America engages in terrorism. Peck also made not mention about Hiroshima or Nagasaki, as Wright claimed.

Here are some quotes from various venues that the Rev. Wright has spoken at in the last few days:

At the National Press Club in Washington:

“I stand before you to open up this two-day symposium with the hope that this most recent attack on the black church is not an attack on Jeremiah Wright; it is an attack on the black church. … The most recent attack on the black church, it is our hope that this just might mean that the reality of the African-American church will no longer be invisible.”

“Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls, Huffington, whoever’s doing the polls. Preachers say what they say because they’re pastors. They have a different person to whom they’re accountable. As I said, whether he gets elected or not, I’m still going to have to be answerable to God November 5 and January 21. That’s what I mean. I do what pastors do. He does what politicians do. I am not running for office. I am hoping to be vice president. …He didn’t distance himself. He had to distance himself because he’s a politician. From what the media was saying I had said, which was anti-American. He said I didn’t offer any words of hope. How would he know? He never heard the rest of the sermon. You never heard it. I offered words of hope. I offered reconciliation, I offered restoration in that sermon, but nobody heard the sermon. They just heard this little sound bite of a sermon.”

“God doesn’t bless everything. God condemns some things. And dem, D-E-M, is where we get the word damn. God damns some practices and there’s no excuse for the things that the government, not the American people, have done. That doesn’t make me not like America or unpatriotic.”

“I feel that those citizens who say that have never heard my sermons, nor do they know me. They are unfair accusations taken from sound bites and that which is looped over and over on certain channels. I served six years in the military. Does that make me patriotic? How many years did Cheney serve?”

From a speech at the NAACP:

“I’m not here for political reasons. I am not a politician. I know that fact will surprise many of you because many in the corporate-owned media have made it seem as if I have announced that I’m running to for the Oval Office. I am not running for the Oval Office. I’ve been running for Jesus a long, long time, and I’m not tired yet.”

“In the past, we were taught to see others who are different as being deficient. We establish arbitrary norm and then determine that anybody not like us was abnormal. But a change is coming because we no longer see others who are different as being deficient. We just see them as different.”

“I come from a religious tradition where we shout in the sanctuary and march on the picket line. I come from a religious tradition where we give god the glory and the devil the blues. The black religious tradition is different. We do it a different way.”

From an interview on PBS’ “Bill Moyers’ Journal”:

“When you start confusing God and government, your allegiances to government, a particular government and not to God, that you’re in serious trouble because governments fail people. And governments change. And governments lie. And those three points of the sermon. And that is the context in which I was illustrating how the governments biblically and the governments since biblical times, up to our time, changed, how they failed, and how they lie.”

“The persons who have heard the entire sermon understand the communication perfectly. What is not the failure to communicate is when something is taken like a sound bite for a political purpose and put constantly over and over again, looped in the face of the public. That’s not a failure to communicate. Those who are doing that are communicating exactly what they want to do, which is to paint me as some sort of fanatic or as the learned journalist from The New York Times called me, a ‘wack-a-doodle.’”

“He’s a politician, I’m a pastor. We speak to two different audiences. And he says what he has to say as a politician. I say what I have to say as a pastor. Those are two different worlds. I do what I do. He does what politicians do. So that what happened in Philadelphia where he had to respond to the sound bites, he responded as a politician. But he did not disown me because I’m a pastor.”
Go McCain-Romney 2008!

19 Responses to “Obama’s Mentor, Rev. Wright, Charges Attacks Against Him Are Really Against the “Black Church””

  1. [...] nobody@flickr.com (doinkaunddinka) wrote an interesting post today on Obamaâs Mentor, Rev. Wright, Charges Attacks Against Him Are Really Against the âBlack ChurchâHere’s a quick excerpt Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s ex-pastor, has been on a tour going around America trying to defend his controversial statements that most Americans have heard and found very disturbing. He has, in the process, made some more incendiary statements, digging a hole for himself that is even deeper than it was just four short days ago. At the National Press Club in Washington DC, he defended his “chickens come home to roost” statement about 9/11 saying, “You cannot do terrorism on other people and exp [...]

  2. SOME OF WHAT WRIGHT SAYS MAKES SENSE AND SOME OF IT IS FROM ANOTHER PLANET.

  3. [...] Continue Reading  Posted on: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 at 8:31 am  Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]

  4. I don’t see where Rev. Wright is being attack, Obama is the one thats being asked why he stayed in a Church with a pastor that is anti-American against his country that he wants to become president of. Why does he still call Rev. Wright his long loved uncle? There is many questions that Obama will not answer with a straight forward answer. Obama has been dived bomb by Rev. Wright and falling out of the sky fast and the beam of light is going out!

  5. I would be more concerned about the Neocons who got us into the Iraq fiasco and who are now gathering around McCain.

    I am now starting to be of the opinion that McCain is not much more cerebral than GW Bush.

    At least Obama is capable of recognising what Wright says that is of value and what is not.

  6. [...] and found very disturbing. He has, in the process, made some more incendiary statements, digginghttp://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/obamas-mentor-rev-wright-charges-attacks-against-him-are-re…A Note on the Presidential Primary Exit Polls US News & World ReportThis year exit polls have [...]

  7. [...] home to roost??? statement about 9/11 saying, ???You cannot do terrorism on other people and exphttp://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/obamas-mentor-rev-wright-charges-attacks-against-him-are-re…Obama Adds to Distance From Pastor and Opinions New York TimesAs the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. [...]

  8. I think it’s great that the democrats have their own Pat Robertson and Jerry Farwell to deal with. Listen, you CAN NOT sit under such a strong voice and not be influenced by it. Who is Barack Obama kidding? The last 20 years of his life, he has said were some of his most formative years…your telling me that you would stay that long under a pastor you don’t agree with… or know has these opinions? Rev. Wright just all the sudden felt the need? I think that Rev. Wright will be “right” until the media says he is “wrong”… then he can go rest on his laurels in his multi-million dollar home, in his prominent white neighborhood, retiring in style on the coffers built by his black parishoners. I can tell he is suffering under the “injustice” of his race. He is making this about race… He is setting this up as an “us” and “them”… When Barack actually has to have content to back up his retoric…and has to reveal what he really feels about these issues…I can only say Republicans… 4 more years.

  9. writetools,

    I, among others, have been saying for a long time that Barack Obama could NOT have been sitting under Wright’s tutalage for 2 decades and NOT heard and known what Wright was all about. The “church” is patterned after James Cone and his book ‘Black Power and Black Theology.’

    This is taken directly from Trinity United Church of Christ’s website in the “Talking Points section, and it written by Barack Obama’s mentor, Jeremiah Wright:

    “…The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology that started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone’s book, Black Power and Black Theology.

    Since Mr. Wright gives credit to Dr. James Cone’s book, Black Power and Black Theology, it behooves us to examine just what Dr. Cone teaches through his books.

    “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”

    Obama went to Harvard Law School (they don’t let just anybody in), where he became the first African-American president of the prestigious Harvard Law Review. He graduated magna cum laude in 1991.

    I will say this until people realize the truth about Barack H. Obama: Obama is a political FRAUD!

    Why don’t people understand that if he isn’t stupid (and he isn’t), then he MUST have known what was going on in his church. If then he did know, then he has been decieving(can you say LYING) us. And if he has been decieving us, then maybe he ACTUALLY believes the things that he has been hearing all these years. And if he believes these things that he has been hearing all these years- BE AFRAID! Be VERY AFRAID!

    Do all you can to make sure that this man is not elected, or we could be going down a path that will ultimately tear this country to sunder. I am NOT kidding or exagerating. I believe this man is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS for our country, and indeed, the entire world.

  10. [...] and found very disturbing. He has, in the process, made some more incendiary statements, digginghttp://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/obamas-mentor-rev-wright-charges-attacks-against-him-are-re…Sen. Bill Nelson: White House race holds key to future of space program Orlando SentinelAs shuttle [...]

  11. I put more credence in Wright’s statement that “He had to distance himself because he’s a politician…Politicians say what they say and do what they do based on electability, based on sound bites, based on polls” than on Obama’s denials. Obama could not have been sitting in that church for 20 years, marrying with Wright as officiating pastor, having his daughters baptized there, etc. and not known what Jeremiah Wright and Trinity UCC stood for. His denials just do not cut any ice with me.

  12. [...] and found very disturbing. He has, in the process, made some more incendiary statements, digginghttp://777denny.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/obamas-mentor-rev-wright-charges-attacks-against-him-are-re…God helps carry the burdens no one else does Seattle Post-IntelligencerA reader writes: “I know you [...]

  13. gasdocpol,

    I cannot think of ANY comments (taken in context) that I agree with Rev. Wright about. Please give me some examples (in context) of what you agree with him about.

    As far as your comments about Obama recognising what is valuable about what Wright is saying, the Rev. has been saying these things for years now, and Obama is just now worried about it? I may not be very smart, but I don’t think I am so naive as to think that a guy who wrote books concerning his church and it’s precepts, and who went to the church for 2 decades, did NOT know what was going on in his own church. Heck, he knew about Wright giving Farrakhan it’s highest award and said NOTHING about it until, in my opinion, it was politically important to do so. I don’t think Obama has any credibility left after taking into account his relationship with TWO known terrorists, a long-time friend, indicted Tony Rezko, his racist church and it’s aweful pastor, AND the fact that he maintains that he didn’t, then ‘of course’ he did, hear some objectional comments his pastor made, but instead makes a speech about race relations WITHOUT once mentioning the Democratic party, which was the MAIN purveyor of racism in America for 170 years.

  14. googtimepolitics,

    After seeing all the Wright and Obama exchange words, it seems as though the Rev truly drinks his own Kool-aid and is will to be truthful about it, while Obama keeps his fraud tour going to further his political goals.

  15. Bruce R. Gilson,

    I agree with your sentiments.

    Obama has become non-credible, in my opinion. A better word to describe Obama is that he has become incredible (beyond belief or understanding) to believe. His late rejection of Mr. Wright and his comments, given that fact that Wright has been saying these things for years, is not believable, or unbelievable, to me. I am unwilling to suspend common sense in order to believe Obama’s ‘words’ of late against his former friend, pastor and (although he has denied it recently) MENTOR, Jeremiah Wright.

  16. deeny
    Wrights statement about AIDS was ridiculous but in the context of the USA conducting the Tuskegee experiment and selling poison gas to Saddam and then to indict him for for using it against his own people make it somewhat less ridiculous.

    I KNOW THAT IT IS BLASPHEMY TO SAY THE USA HAS EVER DONE ANYTHING BAD BUT:

    1. We did f*** over the Native Americans pretty good (genicide etc)

    2. Kill a lot of Arab civilians.

    3. Carry out a Mideast policy , including UNCONDITIONAL support of Israel, that Arabs had objected to.

  17. gasdocopol,

    Who said it was “blasphemy” or even bad to say “anything” bad about what the U.S. have ever done?

    As far as the Tuskeegee experiment, it was evil, in my opinion. But as far as I have researched, the government did NOT inject ANYONE with diseases. It just didn’t treat the disease that blacks had already contracted, even though they apparently had the ability to do so.

    We did NOT commit genocide against Native American Indians. Sir, do words even matter to you? Genocide: “The systematic killing of a racial or cultural group.” You do NOT have to lie, deceive, or exaggerate the truth in order to make poi
    nts. Why didn’t you just tell the truth? You could have said that the U.S. government committed some evil acts against American Indians, then proceeded to identify the injustices. But instead, you did not, in which case I then spend time on your error, which makes you look like you don’t want the truth, but insead want people to believe lies and exagerations. Stick to the facts, then you will be more believable, and your integrity will remain intact.

    We did kill alot of Arab civillians on accident. As far as I understand, we killed alot of Japanese civilians and German civilian on purpose to end World War 2.

    As far as I know, we sold Iraq chemicals that could be used for BOTH civilian AND military use. If that is true, then your assertion would be a LIE. Please provide some facts and a web site to clarify your assertion.

    We do NOT have a Mideast policy that ncludes “unconditional support of Israel.” Here is ANOTHER attempt by you (and MANY other liberals) to embellish the truth. Unconditional means: “Not contingent; not determined or influenced by someone or something else.” We have CONDEMNED MANY things that Israel has done over the years. If you mean we haven’t cut any aid off to Israel in all the years we have supported them, this may be true. The same could be said of other Mideast countries, if I am not mistaken, which would make your argument moot.

    Please do NOT waste my time on lies, deceptions, embellishments, or twisting of facts and reality. Then I will have more respect for you and your point of view. Otherwise, you are just one more liberal looking for ways to justify your biases and prejudices, instead of somebody searching for the TRUTH regardless of their opinions, biases and prejudices, in my opinion.

  18. denny ok How is this?

    1. The US govenrment knew the blacks has Syphhilis, lied to them, did not treat them and used them as laboratory animals

    2. We killed off the buffaloes , gave them Small pox infested blankets , slaughtered them etc. we interred the Japanese during WW2.

    3. Japan attacked us as did Germany did before and after they declared war on US. Iraq did not attack us. Iraqi deaths were unnecessary because Bush/Cheney lied us into that fiasco

    4. Israel has had more US resolutions against it than disd Saddam. USA was often the only supporter of israel before the UN.

    5. WE SOLD THE POISON GAS TO SADDAM. You have seen the photo of Rumsfeld smiling as he shook hands with Saddam after he gassed the Kurds ?

    6. I am not a Liberal

  19. gasdocpol,

    1) You are, in my opinion, probably correct.

    2) You will have to show me evidence of Europeans purposely giving small pox infested blankets to American Indians. We did not “slaughter them ect.” Democrat Harry Truman did intern Japanese during WW2.

    3) Iraq was in violation of the ceasefire agreement from the first Gulf War. We resumed the war since the ceasefire agreement was made void by the non-fulfillment of it by the Iraq government. Where is your proof that Bush/Cheney lied. If they lied, then didn’t most of the Clinton Administration and many Democrats do the same thing when they said some of the very things for many years that Bush and Cheney said?

    4)The U.N. is patently anti-Israel and pro-Arab, in my opinion, so it is NOT surprising that they would vote against Israel in resolution after resolution. The United States therefore probably did the right thing by NOT voting to condemn Israel when the resolutions were unfounded or biased against Israel, in my opinion.

    5) Again, where is your factual web site to CONFIRM that the U.S. sold “poison gas” to Iraq? As far as I have researched, we sold them particular elements for non-military purposes that also could be used for military purposes.

    6) Thanks for letting me know you are not a liberal. I will counter that with a charge against you that you seem to have displayed what many would consider liberal view points on this blog, in my opinion.

Leave a Reply